A new scientific analysis concludes that the European Food Safety Authority's (EFSA) claim that glyphosate is not genotoxic cannot be justified on the basis of manufacturers’ studies. Of the 53 industry-funded studies used for the EU’s current authorization of glyphosate, 34 were identified as "not reliable", 17 as "partly reliable" and only 2 studies as "reliable" from a methodological point of view.
Last week, the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) acknowledged in a public statement that chlorpyrifos is harmful to human health and does not meet the criteria for renewal on the European market . A coalition of NGOs including HEAL, SumOfUs, PAN Europe, PAN Germany and Générations Futures welcomes this statement, which is a first step in order to get chlorpyrifos banned as soon as possible.
According to the European agency, “the pesticide chlorpyrifos does not meet the criteria required by legislation for the renewal of its approval in the European Union” – a statement which is valid for both forms of chlorpyrifos-ethyl and -methyl. EFSA“identified concerns about possible genotoxic effects as well as neurological effects during development, supported by epidemiological data indicating effects in children.”
This statement comes in response to a request from the European Commission on the available results of the human health assessment as EFSA is still performing the peer-review of the renewal dossier of chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-methyl. The deadline for a decision on the renewal of both active substances is 31st January 2020. The European Commission is reported to be supportive of a ban of chlorpyrifos , which civil society groups have urged the European authorities and governments to support . This confirms concerns already highlighted by a significant body of scientific evidence.
More than 212,000 people have signed a petition  asking European decision makers to not approve the relicensing of chlorpyrifos, especially due to its harmful effects on children’s brain development.
Our Coalition now urges the European Commission and national governments to follow EFSA’s lead and support a full ban of chlorpyrifos in both -ethyl and -methyl forms as soon as possible. Considering the amount of scientific evidence already available on chlorpyrifos’ harm for health – especially for children – European citizens would be shocked and disappointed if chlorpyrifos would be granted another year of approval .
Notes: EFSA statement, 2nd August 2019, https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/chlorpyrifos-assessment-identifies-human-health-effects  Le Monde, 17th June 2019, https://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2019/06/17/chlorpyrifos-les-dangers-ignores-d-un-pesticide-toxique_5477084_3244.html  Joint civil society letter to EU ministers, 23rd July 2019, https://www.env-health.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Letter-to-EU-ministers-Your-support-to-the-ban-of-neurotoxic-pesticides-chlorpyrifos-ethyl-and-methyl.pdf  https://actions.sumofus.org/a/chlorpyrifos