A new scientific analysis concludes that the European Food Safety Authority's (EFSA) claim that glyphosate is not genotoxic cannot be justified on the basis of manufacturers’ studies. Of the 53 industry-funded studies used for the EU’s current authorization of glyphosate, 34 were identified as "not reliable", 17 as "partly reliable" and only 2 studies as "reliable" from a methodological point of view.
Members of the European Parliament today objected to a European Commission proposal to allow lead-contaminated recycled PVC to be sold in the EU . The Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL), ClientEarth and the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) have applauded MEPs for using their power of scrutiny in order to ask the European Commission to walk the talk and keep toxics out of the circular economy, a promise outlined in the European Green Deal.
Lead is a well-known toxic metal. There is no safe level of exposure and it can lead to permanent adverse health effects. It is listed as a substance of very high concern under REACH because it may damage several organs or even cause cancer . Exposure of pregnant women to high levels of lead can cause miscarriages, stillbirth, premature birth and low birth weight .
Natacha Cingotti, senior policy officer for health and chemicals at the Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL) said: “We congratulate MEPs for using their powers to urge the European Commission to walk the talk on the EU Green Deal and for clearly stating that the circular economy must promote non-toxic material loops. When going back to the drawing table, the EU Commission must make a proposal that is in line with its own commitments towards protecting our health and environment.”
Tatiana Santos, chemicals policy manager at the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) said: “Even the Romans understood that lead is poisonous. Yet today, the Commission is happy to let hundreds of thousands of tonnes of polluted PVC be recycled into new consumer products. This threatens to unnecessarily expose generations of Europeans and the environment. We need to remove known toxic chemicals from our homes and environment, not add more. The circular economy cannot become a dumping ground for contaminants. Fortunately, the European Parliament stood up for that principle today.”
The European Parliament environment committee already objected to the Commission’s proposal in January, stating that “recycling should not justify the continued use of hazardous substances, as prevention takes priority over recycling” .
Citizens across Europe contacted their elected representatives ahead of today’s plenary session urging them to vote against the Commission’s proposal, using an online platform launched by WeMove.EU and supported by HEAL and the EEB . Civil society groups also wrote to Members of EU Parliament with a call to action to halt the proposal, highlighting its potential threats to health and the environment .