You are here: Home Page > Environment and Health Policy
Implementing the EU’s Reach chemical policy will yield much larger occupational health benefits than previously thought, scientists commissioned by Europe’s trade union movement have claimed. Even in the first ten years these benefits alone could exceed the entire cost of implementation, the scientists say.
The research was unveiled in the European parliament on Monday at a meeting organised by EU trade union body Etuc and hosted by Guido Sacconi, the assembly’s rapporteur for Reach. Mr Sacconi stressed the importance of safeguarding workers’ health and said it was essential that Reach was not weakened.
Carried out at the University of Sheffield, the research breaks new ground by focusing on how far Reach, as proposed by the European Commission in 2003, will avoid skin and respiratory diseases other than cancer, including dermatitis and chronic pulmonary obstructive disease.
Previous studies have focused more on cancers, study co-author Simon Pickvance told Environment Daily. Whereas these tend to emerge over a long time period, the diseases now looked at appear more quickly, he said.
In the first ten years of Reach, the study calculates the benefits for avoidance of these diseases at €0.66-€6.2bn, with a midpoint estimate of around €3.5bn. Over a longer, 30-year period, it puts the benefits at €21-€161bn, with a midpoint of around €90bn.
In contrast, the European Commission reckons Reach will cost €2.8-€5.2bn to implement over 15 years. The main previous estimate of Reach’s health benefits, carried out for the commission by consultancy RPA, is €27bn over 30 years.
The scientists used new methods to calculate the incidence of three diseases related to workplace exposure to chemicals. They then estimated the proportion that will be avoided by implementing Reach.
For asthma, for example, they expect Reach to avoid 50% of relevant cases, or 40,000 per year. Finally, they monetised the benefits of this avoidance.
The benefits will be felt by very large numbers of workers in many chemical using sectors, Mr Pickvance told Environment Daily, not just industrial operations such as car spraying, but also all users of cleaning products. Many millions of people across Europe are therefore involved, he said.
It was "impossible" at this stage to say whether amendments simplifying Reach that look set to be adopted by EU governments and MEPs would significantly affect the estimates, Mr Pickvance added.
Follow-up: Etuc http://www.etuc.org/, tel: +32 2 224 0411, and the study http://www.etuc.org/a/1585. See also reactions from Guido Sacconi http://www.environmentdaily.com/docs/51019f.doc and environmental group EEB http://www.eeb.org/press/pr_EEB_on_study_on%20REACH_191005.htm
SOURCE: ENDS Environment Daily
Written on 21st October 2005.

>>> HEAL PRIMER on European health and environment
Policy paper: European Environment & Health Action Plan 2004-2010
Final report: Environment and Health in Europe (Jan 2005)
Final report: NGO Strategy Workshop: Taking the environment and health agenda forward in Europe (Dec 2004)
European Public Health Alliance
International Society of Doctors for the Environment
ISDE Austria
Akut Luxembourg
European Academy for Environmental Medicine
All Members
Genon Jensen, Executive Director, tel.: 0032 2 234 3641
Christian Farrar-Hockely, Senior Policy Advisor, tel.: 0032 2 234 3644



European Commission Health
European Environment and Health Committee
European Environment and Health Information System
European Parliament (Committee Environment, Public Health & Consumer Protection)
The Council of the European Union